<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The midden &#187; policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sumdy.edublogs.org/category/policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sumdy.edublogs.org</link>
	<description>education, technology, change</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:02:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Education-UK: League tables, Money saved, Statistics &#8211; How did it get to this????</title>
		<link>http://sumdy.edublogs.org/2008/08/13/education-uk-how-did-it-get-to-this/</link>
		<comments>http://sumdy.edublogs.org/2008/08/13/education-uk-how-did-it-get-to-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 23:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Will Stewart</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[league tables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sumdy.edublogs.org/?p=124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does this say it all? Why do we undervalue education so much?  Why are league tables, saving money and statistics more important than learning? 
&#8220;Education, education, education&#8221; &#8211;  11 years of Labour and 11 years of Tory policy  to show for it!
What a con!
This report was published on the BBC News website [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Does this say it all? Why do we undervalue education so much?  Why are league tables, saving money and statistics more important than learning? </strong></p>
<p>&#8220;Education, education, education&#8221; &#8211;  11 years of Labour and 11 years of Tory policy  to show for it!</p>
<p>What a con!</p>
<p>This <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7555860.stm">report </a>was published on the BBC News website tonight.</p>
<div class="mxb">
<h1>Delay &#8216;likely&#8217; for school tables</h1>
</div>
<p><!-- S BO --> <!-- S IIMA --></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="226" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<div><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/44914000/jpg/_44914434_9657c0e0-8855-49f2-994d-e70a1aa0c007.jpg" border="0" alt="Mark sheet" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="226" height="170" /></p>
<div class="cap">The results for tests for 14 year olds showed a mixed picture</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- E IIMA --> <!-- S SF --></p>
<p class="first"><strong>This year&#8217;s school &#8220;league tables&#8221; in England are likely to be postponed because of the test marking problems.</strong></p>
<p>Schools Minister Jim Knight said he expected the delays in marking and and appeals to push back publication.</p>
<p>Provisional figures for national tests suggest 14-year-olds did better in writing and maths this year but less well in reading and science.</p>
<p>A breakdown by local authorities has not been released as up to half the results were missing in some areas. <!-- E SF --></p>
<p>The schools minister said he expected the problems with the delivery of the tests to mean that the timetable for publication of school results would have to be pushed back.</p>
<p><strong>Test problems</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s likely that they won&#8217;t be published at the same time as last year &#8211; because we&#8217;ve got a review process that&#8217;s open for people to submit for reviews until September,&#8221; said Mr Knight.</p>
<p><!-- S IBOX --></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="231" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="5"><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif" border="0" alt="" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="5" height="1" /></td>
<td class="sibtbg">
<div class="sih">USUAL ANNUAL SCHEDULE</div>
<div class="mva">
<div class="bull">May &#8211; Key Stage 2 and 3 tests taken by children aged 10/11 and 13/14</div>
<div class="bull">July &#8211; results returned to schools</div>
<div class="bull">August &#8211; provisional national and local authority results published</div>
<div class="bull">December &#8211; Key Stage 2 tables published showing results for each primary school</div>
<div class="bull">January &#8211; Key Stage 3 tables published showing results of each secondary school</div>
<div class="bull">January (not affected by the problems this year) &#8211; main secondary school and college tables based on results of public exams including GCSEs and A/AS-levels</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- E IBOX -->&#8220;That inevitably has consequences for the timetable and being able to publish school results.&#8221;</p>
<p>The league tables for primary schools, based on the Key Stage 2 results, are usually published each December with the Key Stage 3 tables in January.</p>
<p>The deadline for returning all the marked papers has been missed by more than a month already &#8211; there will be appeals over marking to be resolved in the autumn term before the results process will be complete.</p>
<p>Mr Knight said that this year&#8217;s results for the tests taken by 14 year olds were &#8220;mixed&#8221; &#8211; with marginal rises and falls across subjects &#8211; but he rejected the suggestion that the figures had reached a plateau.</p>
<p>However he highlighted how much more difficult it became to push this figure higher &#8211; when more than two-thirds of those who had missed the Level 5 target either had special needs or spoke English as a second language.</p>
<p>&#8220;Each extra gain becomes harder to achieve for schools,&#8221; said Mr Knight.</p>
<p>There had been a slight fall in English &#8211; from 74% to 73% &#8211; but within this there had been a fall to 69% in reading.</p>
<p><strong>&#8216;Boys and books&#8217;</strong></p>
<p>Mr Knight said that he wanted families to help encourage a love of reading, particularly among boys.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s the classic problem of boys and books,&#8221; said Mr Knight. A more personalised approach to learning in school, more books aimed at keeping boys&#8217; attention and more support from families would help to improve boys&#8217; reading skills, he said.</p>
<p><!-- S IBOX --></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="231" align="right">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="5"><img src="http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/shared/img/o.gif" border="0" alt="" hspace="0" vspace="0" width="5" height="1" /></td>
<td class="sibtbg">
<div class="sih">2008 KEY STAGE 3 RESULTS</div>
<div class="mva">
<div class="bull">LEVEL 5</div>
<div class="bull">English: 73% (74% last year)</div>
<div class="bull">Maths: 77% (76%)</div>
<div class="bull">Science: 71% (73%)</div>
<div class="bull">LEVEL 6</div>
<div class="bull">English: 33% (32%)</div>
<div class="bull">Maths: 57% (56%)</div>
<div class="bull">Science: 41% (41%)</div>
</div>
<div class="mva">Source: DCSF</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><!-- E IBOX -->Head teachers&#8217; leader John Dunford said that it was a “shame that this year’s marking controversy has overshadowed all the hard work that pupils and teachers have put in&#8221;.</p>
<p>He also cautioned that &#8220;far too much is made each year of a percentage point or two up or down in the Key Stage 3 results in English, mathematics and science. What is important is that the trend is upwards, reflecting the rising standards in schools across the country&#8221;.</p>
<p>The National Union of Teachers said the decision not to release the local figures was understandable &#8211; but none of the results should have been published in view of the delays and questions over the marking organised this year by private contractor ETS.</p>
<p>But Chris Keates, leader of the NASUWT teachers&#8217; union said the results were evidence of hard work and progress &#8211; and attacked those who queried the results.</p>
<p>&#8220;Sadly, but predictably, the critics have stepped forward to once again cast a shadow over the achievements of the pupils and their teachers</p>
<p>The general secretary of the Association of Teachers and Lecturers (ATL), Dr Mary Bousted, said: the tests were an irrelevance.</p>
<p>&#8220;In a year when Sats have collapsed under their own weight, cutting the Key Stage 3 tests would be an excellent way to reduce the excessive amount of testing our students face.&#8221;</p>
<p>Liberal Democrat children spokeswoman Annette Brooke agreed and said the money saved could be used to improve learning.</p>
<p>She said: &#8220;Ministers have once again failed to meet their own targets. After three years of secondary education, thousands of pupils are not reaching the expected level in key subjects.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s a disgrace that on the day the results have been published, many schools will still not yet have received their marked papers.&#8221;</p>
<p>Shadow schools minister Nick Gibb said: &#8220;The government continues to miss its modest targets and we are left with the unacceptable position that two out of five 14-year-olds are failing to achieve the necessary grades in reading, writing and maths that they will need to be able to achieve at GCSE.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Statistical change</strong></p>
<p>Statisticians at the Department for Children, Schools and Families, which issued the results, say comparisons with previous years are skewed by a change in the marking process.</p>
<p>This involved removing the practice known as &#8220;borderlining&#8221;, which involved double checking all the test scripts with marks just below the benchmark level (but not above it), to see if they warranted any extra marks.</p>
<p>The effect is particularly significant in English, in which the marking is more subjective.</p>
<p>The statisticians say removing borderlining is estimated to reduce the percentage achieving Level 5 (the expected minimum level) by 0.9 percentage points in English, 0.2 points in maths and 0.6 points in science.</p>
<p>At Level 6 the effect is even more pronounced: about 1.6 percentage points in English, 0.3 in maths and 0.9 in science.</p>
<p>The figures show that the proportion of children attaining Level 5 in reading, writing, maths and science was 56% &#8211; down two percentage points on last year or roughly the amount predicted by the removal of borderlining.</p>
<p>The DCSF says the results were based on the data available at 25 July.</p>
<p>These included 84% of English results and 94% of the maths and science results, deemed to be a robust enough sample to produce reliable national figures.</p>
<p>Updated figures from the Qualifications and Curriuclum Authority show that the proportion of pupils&#8217; test results for 14 year olds now available to schools is 92.8% in English, 96.6% Maths and 96.0% science.</p>
<p>The tests &#8211; popularly known by the misnomer &#8220;Sats&#8221; &#8211; are a measure of children&#8217;s achievement against targets in Key Stage 3 of the national curriculum, the first three years of secondary schooling in England.</p>
<p>There is no equivalent publication of test results for other parts of the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://sumdy.edublogs.org/2008/08/13/education-uk-how-did-it-get-to-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
